Competitive Comparison
Meta vs. Alphabet vs. Microsoft vs. Amazon
Four mega-cap AI-capex bets, two of which I hold outright and two of which I've chosen to watch instead — compared on growth-adjusted valuation and the scale of their AI spending.
| Metric | Meta Platforms (META) | Alphabet (GOOGL) | Microsoft (MSFT) | Amazon (AMZN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG ratio | 0.82 | 0.56 | 1.33 | 1.47 |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.28x | 15.27x | n/a (5yr EBITDA growth 18.2%) | 18.72x |
| Capex (2026) | $115–135B (guidance) | −$109.92B (TTM) | $97.23B (TTM) | −$151.00B (TTM) |
PEG ratio, compared
Why Meta and Alphabet, not Microsoft or Amazon
All four are funding massive AI infrastructure buildouts, and on PEG alone Alphabet (0.56) and Meta (0.82) both screen cheaper than Microsoft (1.33) and Amazon (1.47) relative to their growth. I hold Meta because its core ad-targeting business is a real, checkable cash engine funding the AI bet, not a story on its own; Alphabet for the same reason plus a credible long-horizon AI research lead. Microsoft and Amazon are watchlist names rather than holdings mainly for portfolio-construction reasons, not a fundamentals verdict against them — Amazon's negative TTM capex-adjusted free cash flow in particular is worth watching before I'd add it outright, and both would add real overlap with my existing AI-infrastructure exposure through NBIS, CRWV, and VRT rather than diversify it.