Independent student research — not an investment firm or financial advice
Competitive Comparison
Datadog vs. Dynatrace
Two cloud observability platforms serving the same growing telemetry-monitoring market, from different starting points on breadth versus depth.
Metric
Datadog (DDOG)
Dynatrace (DT)
PEG ratio
0.89
0.82–1.49 (varies)
EV/EBITDA
2,575x (small EBITDA base)
38.19x
Market cap
n/a
$11.45B
PEG ratio, compared
DDOG
0.89
DT
0.82
Same PEG ratio figures as the table above, plotted for a direct read. Bold = held in this book.
Market cap, P/E, PEG, EV/EBITDA, and capex sourced via public filings and financial-data aggregators (GuruFocus, StockAnalysis, company earnings releases), as of July 2026. PEG ratio sourced primarily from GuruFocus where available; different providers use different growth-rate assumptions, so figures elsewhere for the same stock can vary by several multiples. Gold-highlighted column(s) indicate the name(s) actually held in this book.
Why Datadog over Dynatrace
Dynatrace's EV/EBITDA is dramatically lower than Datadog's, reflecting a more mature, higher-margin business already past $2 billion in ARR with consistent double-digit growth — a genuinely strong, less speculative business by that measure. I hold Datadog specifically for its platform breadth: it covers infrastructure, application, and log monitoring in a single unified product built for a cloud-native, multi-service architecture, while Dynatrace's strength is traditionally deeper in APM (application performance monitoring) for more complex enterprise environments. Both are legitimate ways to own the same broader observability-market growth; I've chosen the broader platform bet over the deeper specialist.