Market snapshot, not real-time
S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00% S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00%

Position · Emerging Growth

Talen Energy Corporation (TLN)

3.28% of book · Avg. cost $314.57 · Return +6.21%

Compare vs. competitors: Talen Energy vs. Vistra vs. Constellation Energy →

Read the full Q1 2026 earnings report →

Subscribe to TLN updates (RSS) →

Download full 3-statement model (.xlsx) →

Thesis StatementTalen's nuclear and dispatchable power fleet sits directly in the path of AI-driven electricity demand, evidenced by its own power-purchase agreement with AWS.

TLN Talen Energy Corporation
AEA Institutional Tear Sheet
3.28% of book · Avg. cost $314.57 · Return +6.21%

Core Thesis

Talen is an independent power producer with roughly 2.2GW of nuclear generation plus a dispatchable fossil fleet, selling wholesale power into PJM markets across the Mid-Atlantic, Ohio, and Montana — nuclear baseload capacity is exactly the kind of asset...

Financial Metrics

  • Market Cap$17.43B
  • P/E (TTM)N/A — not meaningful; trailing EPS is negative
  • EPS (TTM)-$0.51
  • Div. Yield0.00%
  • Price$364.67

Bear Case

New generation capacity (gas, renewables, or otherwise) comes online faster than expected and eases the current power-demand tightness, wholesale power prices soften from currently elevated levels, and a broad "AI capex is slowing" scare hits both Talen and...

Investment Thesis

The Thesis
Talen is an independent power producer with roughly 2.2GW of nuclear generation plus a dispatchable fossil fleet, selling wholesale power into PJM markets across the Mid-Atlantic, Ohio, and Montana — nuclear baseload capacity is exactly the kind of asset hyperscalers want under long-term contracts.
The Catalyst
Data-center power demand is one of the clearer, more durable AI-adjacent themes I can point to, and further long-term power-purchase agreements with hyperscalers would be the concrete sign that demand tightness keeps favoring baseload nuclear supply.
The Risk
New generation capacity could come online faster than expected and ease the current power-demand tightness, and a broad "AI capex is slowing" scare would hit both Talen and my correlated VST position together.
The Connection
Core to my power/AI-driven electricity demand theme alongside VST and VRT — a direct bet on the physical infrastructure constraint underneath the AI buildout.

Pre-Mortem Thesis Invalidation Parameters

Codified in advance, before any of these have happened, so a future decision to hold or exit isn't rationalized in the moment. If a condition below is met, the thesis as written is invalidated and the position gets re-underwritten from scratch — not automatically sold, but automatically questioned.

Metric / EventAutomatic Review Trigger
Wholesale Power PricesSoften for 2 consecutive quarters from currently elevated levels.
New Generation CapacityDisclosed new gas or renewable capacity additions materially ease the power-demand tightness driving the thesis.
Market cap$17.43B
P/E ratio (TTM)N/A — not meaningful; trailing EPS is negative
EPS (TTM)-$0.51
Dividend yield0.00%
Shares outstandingN/A — not provided
SectorElectric Services
EBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization — a measure of operating profitability before financing and accounting decisions. EV/EBITDA compares a company's full value (including debt) to this figure, often used to compare companies with different capital structures.FY26 Adj. EBITDA guidance $1.75–2.05B
PEG ratioPrice/Earnings-to-Growth: the P/E ratio divided by expected earnings growth. Below 1.0 is often read as cheap relative to growth; above suggests the market is pricing in a lot of future growth already. Different providers use different growth-rate assumptions, so figures vary by source.N/A (not meaningfully calculable)
CapexNuclear fuel + digital-infrastructure buildout; no clean consolidated FY26 figure published

Market cap, EPS, and dividend yield via Blossom. No dividend. P/E isn't meaningful given negative trailing EPS. Shares outstanding not available from a source I trust for this entry — left blank rather than estimated. EBITDA, PEG ratio, and capex sourced from public filings and financial-data aggregators (GuruFocus, StockAnalysis, company earnings releases). PEG ratio is sourced primarily from GuruFocus where available; different providers calculate PEG using different growth-rate assumptions, so figures from other sources for the same stock can vary by several multiples — a known limitation of PEG as a metric, not unique to any name here.

Valuation Logic

Trailing EPS is negative on a GAAP basis even as Adjusted EBITDA more than doubled this quarter; the valuation case leans on Adjusted EBITDA and free-cash-flow multiples rather than a traditional P/E, given accounting noise from hedges and long-dated capacity contracts.

DCF Sensitivity Tool

A simplified single-stage model for exploring how WACC and terminal growth assumptions move an implied share price — not AEA's own valuation of this stock. Adjust the base cash-flow figure to run your own numbers.

Implied Share Price
Formula: Base FCF/Share × (1 + terminal growth) ÷ (WACC − terminal growth). A real DCF would forecast several years of cash flow explicitly rather than capitalize a single base year in perpetuity — this tool is a simplified illustration of how sensitive that kind of valuation is to two assumptions, not a price target.
$255.50 (52-wk low)$364.67$451.28 (52-wk high)

About the business

Talen Energy is an independent power producer with roughly 2.2GW of nuclear generation plus a dispatchable fossil fleet, selling wholesale power into PJM markets across the Mid-Atlantic, Ohio, and Montana. It's one of the more direct ways to own the "AI data centers need a lot more electricity" theme through an established generation asset base rather than a story stock.

Why it's sized this way

Data-center power demand is one of the clearer, more durable AI-adjacent themes I can point to, and Talen's nuclear baseload capacity is exactly the kind of asset hyperscalers want under long-term contracts. I also hold VST on the same power/AI-demand theme, so I'm intentionally aware these two positions are correlated — a broad move in wholesale power prices or data-center demand assumptions would hit both at once, not just one.

Risk/Reward Profile

Bull CaseBear Case
PJM wholesale power prices stay elevated as data-center demand growth outpaces new generation supply, Talen signs additional long-term power-purchase agreements with hyperscalers on the strength of its nuclear baseload, and the market re-rates independent power producers as a structural AI-demand beneficiary.New generation capacity (gas, renewables, or otherwise) comes online faster than expected and eases the current power-demand tightness, wholesale power prices soften from currently elevated levels, and a broad "AI capex is slowing" scare hits both Talen and VST together given how correlated the two positions are on this theme.

Base case: Power demand grows steadily from data centers and broader electrification, PJM pricing stays firm but doesn't spike further, and Talen's earnings track the wholesale power market without a dramatic re-rating either way.

Download this position's data

Fundamentals, scenario matrix, and risk/reward table — exported exactly as published on this page, no reformatting.

Macro Stress-Test: How TLN Fits In

The book-level stress test runs four scenarios against the whole portfolio. Here is exactly where TLN sits in each one — named directly, or not addressed at all. Nothing below is invented for this page; it’s the same book-level analysis, filtered to this position.

Current positioning, no shock assumed

TLN is 3.44% of the book, in the Power & Utilities sector. See the full base-case positioning on Holdings.

Where this position sits in the book’s least-defended scenario

Not individually named in the book-level inflation analysis. TLN contributes to the book’s overall growth-multiple exposure only through its Power & Utilities sector weight — see the full scenario on Holdings for what is and isn’t defended.

Not individually assessed

Where this position sits in the book’s best-defended scenario

TLN is a liquid, publicly traded security like every other position in the book — no private equity, no illiquid credit, no lockups. A genuinely broad market drawdown would still hurt (the book’s beta is 1.79), but this position doesn’t face the structural exit friction an illiquid holding would.

Liquid, publicly traded

Where this position sits in the book’s largest concentrated risk

Not part of the semiconductor sleeve this scenario is built around. TLN sits in Power & Utilities, so a Taiwan-centered supply disruption would hit this position only indirectly, if at all, through broader market effects.

Outside the named semiconductor exposure