Tool · Risk · No login
The Sharpe & Sortino Ratio Calculator
Compute risk-adjusted return
Reading the two ratios
Return per unit of total risk
(Annualized return − risk-free rate) ÷ annualized volatility. Penalizes upside and downside volatility equally — a name that rips higher in violent moves still scores worse than one that grinds up quietly.
Return per unit of downside risk
Same numerator, but the denominator only counts days with negative returns. A name with big up-days and small down-days can show a much higher Sortino than Sharpe — that gap is itself informative about the shape of its returns.
Backward-looking, not predictive
Above 1.0 is generally considered a good risk-adjusted return; below 0 means the volatility wasn't compensated even before the risk-free hurdle. Neither ratio says anything about tomorrow, and both are computed here over a short, partial-year sample.
Why this instead of just eyeballing the return
AEA's own book leans into a few high-volatility names on purpose — that's a documented, deliberate choice, not an oversight. Sharpe and Sortino are the standard way a risk desk checks whether that volatility is actually being paid for by return, name by name, rather than just assumed. It's the same question the Leverage Decay Study asks about daily-reset funds, applied here to ordinary equities.
Methodology & limitations
Data source. Real daily closing prices from research/_data/price_history.json, the same dataset extracted from each position's own published price-chart data. No live API call is made by this tool.
Formulas. Annualized return = mean(daily log returns) × 252. Annualized volatility = stdev(daily log returns) × √252 — identical to the formula used in the Volatility & Correlation Engine, so the two tools can be cross-checked against each other. Downside deviation uses only negative daily log returns, against a minimum acceptable return (MAR) of zero — the most common convention, not AEA's actual cost of capital.
Sample size. Ranges from 57 to 125 real trading days depending on the name — short enough that these are indicative, not statistically robust, estimates. They should not be read as a stable, permanent property of the stock.
Not investment advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any security.