Market snapshot, not real-time
S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00% S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00%
For admissions readers: a quick, evidence-first way into the work. 3-minute guide What I built One post-mortem

Student Investor · Independent Research

Discipline, in public.

A public equity-research journal by Aydin Ali — a student investor documenting decisions, risks, and revisions in real time, governed by a written Investment Policy Statement and open about where it wasn't followed. Not a fund, not a firm — one person's practice, run on the record.

For First-Time Readers

The 3-minute version of this work

A short path through purpose, process, self-correction, and growth. The holdings and performance record are here too; this is the context that makes them worth reading.

  1. 01

    Why I built this

    Avoiding impulsive decisions, separating thesis from outcome, and learning to revise beliefs in public — the short version, under 400 words.

  2. 02

    Investment Policy Statement

    The written rules for sizing, sell discipline, and accountability — set before the moment of temptation, not after.

  3. 03

    One post-mortem

    "What I Got Wrong" — a standing, dated admission of a call that missed, and the specific process flaw it exposed.

  4. 04

    Why this, why transfer

    A direct crosswalk from NOVA coursework to this practice to what a four-year program actually pressure-tests — plus a full whitepaper as the receipt.

The performance chart, the full holdings table, and the rest of the archive are all real and all here — they're just not the point of a first visit. This is.

32Active Positions
9.8 : 1Core : Speculative Ratio
$500Starting Capital, 2022

Data verified: July 31, 2026

Process over performance: this account started in 2022 with $500 and has run continuously since. Its real, dollar-weighted all-time return is +72.14%, verified via Blossom — but four years is not a long enough track record to prove investing skill, and I don't treat it as one. What it did teach me: most of my mistakes have been sizing mistakes, not stock-picking mistakes, which is why the IPS and the post-mortem record are the more honest evidence of process than the number above. A matched year-to-date comparison against SPY is in progress — see the July letter for the full accountability framework.

AA

A Note From Me

Wednesday the book fell 0.75% on a flat index day — ServiceNow's worst single session in months, SpaceX's fourth down day in two weeks, and, on the other side, CoreWeave, Talen, and Broadcom all quietly grinding higher. I wrote it up the same afternoon rather than waiting to see how the week ended. That's the actual point of this site: not a polished quarterly recap, but the honest, dated record of what I owned, why, and how it moved while I was still finding out.

Aydin Ali, writing this from the same account I trade in

Macro & Rates Context

Sourced independently, refreshed periodically — not part of the daily price pipeline.

Fed Funds Rate 3.50–3.75% FOMC, June 17, 2026
Unemployment Rate 4.2% BLS, June 2026 reading
Core CPI (YoY) 2.6% BLS, June 2026 reading
Thematic Concentration 60.93% Full breakdown

Data as of July 24, 2026 — CPI and unemployment refreshed via Massive Market Data (Fed Labor Market series); Fed Funds Rate unchanged since the last FOMC meeting; Treasury yields shown in the Yield Curve & Credit Monitor below; HY Credit Spread not yet re-verified this cycle (see note below)

Yield Curve & Credit Monitor

2Y Treasury 4.18%
10Y Treasury 4.55%
10Y–2Y Spread +0.37 Normal
HY Credit Spread (OAS) 2.70%
2Y/10Y Treasury via Massive Market Data (constant-maturity yields, July 17, 2026). Fed Funds Rate above is the FOMC target range, unchanged since the June 17, 2026 meeting. HY Credit Spread is the ICE BofA US High Yield Index Option-Adjusted Spread — last verified July 8, 2026; not refreshed this cycle because no live source for it is currently connected, so this figure may be stale — the premium below-investment-grade corporate bonds pay over comparable-duration Treasuries; wider spreads generally signal more credit-market stress. "Normal" here means the curve is not inverted (10Y yields above 2Y), not a forecast of what happens next.

Top Performers

Highest return, by position

Ranked purely by real return since cost — not by conviction or position size. All five below happen to be Core-bucket names in or adjacent to the semiconductor/memory cycle; see Holdings for how each is actually sized and capped, and for how the leveraged and speculative-sleeve names have actually performed by comparison.

  1. 1 MU Micron Technology +152.59%
  2. 2 SNDK Sandisk Corp +151.41%
  3. 3 INTC Intel Corporation +140.98%
  4. 4 AMD Advanced Micro Devices +138.86%
  5. 5 META Meta Platforms +137.59%

Return since cost, per Blossom. See the full Interactive Holdings Matrix for all 32 positions, sector, and conviction.

Event Risk

Upcoming Catalysts & Event Risks

Dated, real events with a direct line to the book — not a general market calendar.

  1. Jul 28–29, 2026
    FOMC meeting & rate decision

    Rate held at 3.50–3.75% since June; any signal on the September path directly affects the leveraged sleeve (NBIL) and the power/utilities names.

  2. Jul 29, 2026
    META & VRT Q2 2026 earnings

    Meta is the second-largest position in the book at 8.75%; Vertiv is the power/cooling equipment play on the same AI-datacenter buildout. Both under the Blackout Rule.

  3. Aug 5, 2026
    SNDK fiscal Q4 & FY2026 earnings

    The largest position in the book, currently flagged Under Review after its weight drifted back under the 10% cap on a price pullback, not a trim. This print is the real test of whether the NAND pricing thesis holds. Under the Blackout Rule.

  4. Aug 24, 2026
    PANW & EL fiscal Q4 earnings

    Palo Alto Networks and Estee Lauder — cybersecurity platformization and prestige-beauty demand, two of the least-correlated theses in the book, reporting the same day.

Full Catalyst Calendar, including everything already reported →

Keep Reading

Four pieces that go deeper

Past the 3-minute version above: a full research memo, an admitted mistake, the written rules, and the data-driven case behind a live thesis.

Read the full July letter for the complete portfolio map and all ongoing risks. For a longer, independently-synthesized read, download the Portfolio & Watchlist Research Report and the Sector Landscape Overview (.docx).

July 2026 Strategy Tear Sheet

Position count, the full compliance record, concentration risk, and the latest post-mortem — one page, condensed from the full letter.

↓ Download Tear Sheet

Performance Tracker

Real, daily-logged cumulative return against SPY, QQQ, and IWM — indexed, toggleable, and honest about the date tracking actually started.

View Performance Tracker →

Portfolio Composition

By bucket

As of the July 2026 letter, all 32 holdings split into five buckets under the Investment Policy Statement. Click through for the full table, allocation chart, and a page on every position.

Core / quality compounders — 63.7%

The anchor of the book: profitable or clear path-to-profit large & mid caps, spanning semiconductors, cybersecurity, cloud software, power/utilities, and consumer brands. If there's any real edge, it should show up here, not in the speculative names. SNDK, the largest position, is flagged Under Review after drifting back under its 10% cap on a price pullback rather than a trim.

See the full table →

Index hedge — 18.4%

Broad-market and dividend ETFs, always held as ballast. Per the IPS: if the rest of the book can't beat this over time, the honest move is to own more of it and say so.

See the full table →

Emerging growth — 8.6%

Smaller operating companies with real revenue, sized deliberately between the core holdings and the speculative sleeve — concentrated in AI/cloud infrastructure (CRWV, NBIS) and cloud software (DDOG, CRWD).

See the full table →

Speculative sleeve — 6.5%

Micro-caps, story stocks, and pre-profit names, capped at 25% of invested capital. Comfortably under that cap — includes a small, deliberately limited position in SPCX (SpaceX), which only began public trading in June 2026.

See the full table →

Leveraged / derivative — 2.8%

Leveraged & thematic ETFs, daily-reset. Under its 5% cap this month — though it grew slower than the rest of the book, not because I actively trimmed it. See the July letter for the honest version of that story.

Read the full writeup →

Sourced from my live Blossom portfolio, cross-checked against the Coverage Book.

Since Inception

Milestones

  1. 2022

    Started with $500

    Saved earnings and gift money — the entire starting capital, no outside funding.

  2. Early 2026

    Wrote the Investment Policy Statement

    Rules set before the moment of temptation: position limits, sell discipline, a benchmark to be held to.

  3. July 2026

    Linked Blossom verification

    Holdings independently verified — the "Verified via Blossom" badge became literally true, not aspirational.

  4. July 2026

    Published the first letter

    "Portfolio Composition & Ongoing Risks" — the first full, dated positioning letter, on the record.

  5. July 2026

    Grew from 15 to 32 positions

    Added cybersecurity, cloud software, and power-generation names as the book diversified beyond its original semiconductor-heavy core — see the July letter for the full recount.

  6. July 2026

    Started the News desk

    Dated, sourced writeups on real market events touching the book, published the same day they happen — starting with the Nebius/Meta cloud story.

  7. Jul 23, 2026

    Launched the Coverage Book

    An institutional-format one-pager for all 32 positions — business description, thesis, bull/base/bear cases, and valuation, cross-linked to every existing position page.

  8. Next

    First full monthly cycle

    The next letter reports actual time-weighted performance vs. SPY — the first real test of the process, not just a snapshot.

Trading floor at the New York Stock Exchange

Photo: Scott Beale, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Methodology

How this is built

The standard every page on this site is held to — not aspirational, just what's actually true about where the numbers come from.

Verified holdings

Every position, weight, and return is pulled from Blossom, a portfolio-tracking service linked directly to my brokerage — not self-reported.

Company fundamentals

Market cap, shares outstanding, and business descriptions come from Blossom and SEC filings. If a figure isn't available from a source I trust, the page says so instead of guessing.

Price & market data

Historical prices, 52-week ranges, and index comparisons come from Massive Market Data, cited on every chart and range bar where it appears.

Every rule break, reported

The Investment Policy Statement sets position caps before the fact. When a position drifts over one, it's disclosed in the next letter — not quietly resized off the record.

Questions Worth Answering

Before you read further

The questions I'd ask if I found this site cold.

Is this real money?

Yes. It started with $500 of saved earnings and gift money, and every position, weight, and return on this site is pulled from Blossom, a portfolio tracker linked directly to my brokerage — not typed in by hand and not a paper-trading account.

Why publish your own mistakes?

Because a track record that only shows the winners isn't a track record, it's marketing. The Portfolio Review & Retrospective section in every letter exists specifically to admit what didn't go as planned — that's the part that actually demonstrates discipline, not the returns.

Why does this site exist?

Because I genuinely like doing this. I read earnings transcripts and 10-Ks the way other people read box scores, and I got tired of that interest living only in a private spreadsheet where a bad call could be quietly rewritten after the fact. Writing every thesis down, dating it, and reporting on it later is what turned "I like researching stocks" into an actual practice instead of a hobby I only had to answer to myself for.

Who's actually behind this?

One person — Aydin Ali. There's no team, no fund, and no outside capital. The name is a banner for a personal research practice, not a firm, and the site says so plainly rather than implying otherwise.

How often is this actually updated?

A full letter roughly monthly, shorter interim notes when something real happens between letters, and dated news writeups tied to specific holdings as events occur — not a static page that quietly goes stale.

The Weekly Note

Follow the process, week by week

What moved in the book, what I'm reading, and any changes to the positions — the same honesty as the letters, more often. See exactly what an issue looks like before you sign up.